How the Game of Solitaire Gives You a Common Experience
A game is basically a structured form of interactive play, usually undertaken mainly for fun or amusement, and occasionally used as a teaching tool. Games are quite different from work, which tends to be carried out ‘for pay’, and from literature, which is more often a reflection of philosophical or aesthetic elements. The distinction between work and play is often a hard one to draw. The former tends to have a clearly defined objective, a clear end, and a clearly defined means to that end. The latter can have loosely defined objectives and means, but without a clearly defined’means’ to achieve those objectives.
The world of the game is very different, however. There is no clearly defined objective, there is no end, there is no clearly defined means, and certainly, without a clearly defined’means’ there can be chaos. For this reason, the game results are never definitive. Everybody involved in a game can change the outcomes, and nobody can decide beforehand what those outcomes will be. It’s not like you can say, OK we have a winner and now we need to get a loser so we can move on to the next game.
Games are instead situational, always changing, always depending on the players’ perceptions, decisions, attitudes, preparations and abilities, their knowledge of the rules, and so on. This is why no matter how simple a game might be it can still be considered a game: because each time a situation is faced with, it creates new options and new circumstances open to the players. Game rules may restrict how one player may use his own resources to win, or even restrict how another player may use his resources to play. But no matter how a game is structured, it still revolves around situations where the players can alter the outcome.
Therefore, there is a need to understand game theory, the logic of why a game results in certain outcomes and why it is possible for two players to end up at opposite ends of the table by having equal chances of winning. Game theory is the study of why people will play a game, and more importantly, why they will end up at the same end of the table after the game. There are many different types of game theory, the most popular ones being the two-person game theory and the four-person game theory. The two-person game theory states that there is a natural tendency for people to form pairs, where each player considers himself to be at the same position on the board – where player 1 has three cards and player 2 has two cards; then the pair will continue to the next rank on the table, until there are seven players left. This can be illustrated by the famous ‘two against two’ game.
On the other hand, the four-person game theory believes that a four-player game should be controlled by the natural tendencies for people to form groups of four. This is why the sport of American football is so enjoyable, because it requires teamwork, as well as individual skills from each team member. The game results may depend on the skills of each team member playing their part. The game world consists of innumerable such possibilities, ranging from those involving only small pieces such as chess or checkers to massive games like poker. No matter how small or large the game is, it’s all a part of the game world.
These game results have much to do with the common experience of playing games, since people can easily relate to the game results and gain a feeling of satisfaction when they do. The common experience is much more interesting than what people might imagine, since it allows them to step back into another time and another environment. This also creates an opportunity for social interaction, since you get to meet people who share your common experience of playing Solitaire. This is where many people will start to tell stories about how they discovered the game of solitaire, giving you a chance to develop some of your own stories from personal experience.